Lawfare

Lawfare

Share this post

Lawfare
Lawfare
CBS's $16 Million Payout to Trump: A Settlement That Raises More Questions Than Answers

CBS's $16 Million Payout to Trump: A Settlement That Raises More Questions Than Answers

Lawfare's avatar
Lawfare
Jul 02, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Lawfare
Lawfare
CBS's $16 Million Payout to Trump: A Settlement That Raises More Questions Than Answers
Share

In a landmark case that has ignited fierce debate over media freedom, government power, and accountability, CBS and its parent company, Paramount Global, reached a settlement with President Donald Trump in July 2025. The settlement, which included a $16 million payout to Trump, resolved a contentious lawsuit stemming from a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris.

Trump alleged that CBS engaged in election interference by editing the interview to portray Harris more favorably, a claim that fueled a legal battle and threats to revoke CBS’s broadcast license. While the settlement ended the dispute, it has left many questioning whether justice was served or if the media and the Trump administration have once again sidestepped true accountability.

The "60 Minutes" Interview: The Spark of the Controversy

The saga began on October 7, 2024, when CBS aired a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris, conducted by correspondent Bill Whitaker. The segment focused on pressing issues, including the Israel-Gaza conflict. Whitaker asked Harris why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared unresponsive to the Biden administration’s calls for de-escalation.

In the aired version, Harris delivered a concise response, emphasizing the need for the war to end and for humanitarian concerns to take priority. However, a preview clip aired earlier on "Face the Nation" showcased a different portion of her answer—one critics, including Trump, derided as a rambling "word salad."

Trump seized on this discrepancy, accusing CBS of deliberately editing the interview to make Harris appear more coherent and competent than she was, thereby swaying public perception in her favor during a critical election period. He labeled this manipulation as election interference, a charge that would form the backbone of his lawsuit.

CBS, for its part, maintained that the editing was routine, a standard practice to condense lengthy interviews for broadcast while preserving their essence. The network argued that no deceit was intended, but the contrasting clips provided Trump with ammunition to claim otherwise.

The Lawsuit: From $10 Billion to $20 Billion

On October 31, 2024, Trump filed a lawsuit against CBS in a Texas federal court, initially seeking $10 billion in damages. He alleged that the network’s editing constituted a deliberate act of election interference, undermining his campaign by bolstering Harris’s image. The choice of Texas raised eyebrows, with some suggesting Trump was "judge shopping" for a sympathetic venue. Weeks later, he amended the complaint, escalating his demand to a staggering $20 billion, reflecting his growing outrage and the case’s political stakes.

CBS responded aggressively, filing motions to dismiss the suit. The network argued that Trump’s claims were baseless and an attack on journalistic freedom, protected under the First Amendment. Legal experts were divided: some saw the lawsuit as a long shot, while others noted that the Texas court might entertain it due to its conservative leanings. Despite CBS’s efforts, the case survived early dismissal attempts, and settlement talks soon emerged as both sides sought to avoid a protracted legal battle.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Lawfare to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Lawfare
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share