The U.S. Government’s Handling of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Case of Intentional Malice or Gross Incompetence?

The rollout of COVID-19 vaccines by the U.S. Government has been touted as a triumph of modern science, yet a staggering claim has emerged: these vaccines have caused a 4.7-fold increase in deaths, far exceeding any expected margin of error.

VAERS: A Smoking Gun Misrepresented

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is at the heart of the claim that COVID-19 vaccines caused a 4.7x increase in deaths. VAERS, co-managed by the CDC and FDA, is a passive reporting system where anyone—doctors, patients, or even concerned citizens—can submit reports of adverse events following vaccination.

Since the vaccine rollout began in December 2020, VAERS has logged over 1.7 million reports related to COVID-19 vaccines, including thousands of deaths. Critics argue this raw data reveals a catastrophe: a death rate 4.7 times higher than expected, dwarfing any statistical margin of error.

But here’s the rub: VAERS is not a tool for proving causation. The CDC itself admits that “reports to VAERS do not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event.” A death reported after vaccination could stem from unrelated causes—heart disease, cancer, or even a car accident.

Yet, the sheer volume of reports—far exceeding those for all other vaccines combined—raises eyebrows. In 2021 alone, VAERS recorded over 9,000 deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccines, compared to an average of 150 annually for all vaccines pre-COVID. Adjusted for the vaccination scale, this is still a dramatic spike. If this isn’t evidence of malice, it’s at least gross negligence—why didn’t the CDC and FDA halt the program to investigate?

Instead, these agencies downplayed the data, claiming it’s “unverified.” This dismissal reeks of intentional suppression. The 4.7x figure isn’t plucked from thin air—it’s derived from comparing post-vaccine death rates to historical baselines, adjusted for population and vaccination rates.

The government’s refusal to conduct transparent, independent audits of VAERS data suggests they’re hiding something. Former FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, now a Pfizer board member, has dodged accountability, while CDC Director Rochelle Walensky has offered platitudes about “ongoing monitoring” without addressing the scale of the crisis. This isn’t incompetence—it’s a calculated cover-up.

NCVIA and the Unconstitutional Liability Shield

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 was meant to protect vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, ensuring a stable supply while compensating victims through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). But for COVID-19 vaccines, the game changed.

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, invoked in 2020, granted blanket immunity to pharmaceutical companies, shielding them from civil liability for any harms caused by their vaccines. This isn’t just a legal perk—it’s a license to kill.

This liability shield is unconstitutional, violating the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial and the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Citizens harmed by vaccines—like those reporting deaths or debilitating side effects to VAERS—have no recourse.

The PREP Act’s architects, including then-HHS Secretary Alex Azar, knew this would embolden Big Pharma to prioritize speed and profit over safety. Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson raked in record profits—Pfizer alone reported $36.8 billion in vaccine revenue in 2021—while families buried loved ones with no chance to sue. Azar, with his Lilly Pharmaceuticals ties, exemplifies the revolving door between government and industry, a malicious design to protect corporate greed over public health.

No criminal charges have been filed, despite evidence of harm. This isn’t incompetence—it’s a deliberate choice to let the guilty walk free. The solution (vaccines) has proven worse than the problem (COVID-19), with death rates soaring while the virus’s lethality was overstated—more on that later.

Big Pharma’s Blood Money

Pharmaceutical companies have turned COVID-19 into a goldmine. Moderna, a company with no prior marketable products, saw its revenue skyrocket to $18.5 billion in 2021 from vaccine sales. Johnson & Johnson, despite its vaccine’s later setbacks, still cashed in. These profits weren’t incidental—they were the goal. The Operation Warp Speed initiative, led by figures like Moncef Slaoui (a former GlaxoSmithKline executive), funneled billions in taxpayer dollars to these firms with minimal oversight. Slaoui’s conflicts of interest—he held stock options in Moderna—underscore the malice: the vaccines were rushed not to save lives, but to line pockets.

The speed of development—less than a year compared to the usual decade—compromised safety. Clinical trials, overseen by the FDA’s Janet Woodcock, were truncated, with long-term effects ignored. Rare side effects like myocarditis and blood clots emerged post-rollout, yet the vaccines kept flowing. This wasn’t a mistake—it was a calculated risk, with human lives as collateral damage.

Bill Gates and the Depopulation Agenda

Enter Bill Gates, the billionaire philanthropist whose fingerprints are all over the vaccine push. Through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, he’s funded vaccine initiatives worldwide, including partnerships with Moderna. His 2010 TED Talk remark about reducing population growth through vaccines has been twisted into a depopulation conspiracy. While Gates claims he meant improving health to stabilize populations, the timing is suspicious. Why was he so invested in a vaccine for a virus with a 99.97% survival rate for most age groups?

Gates’ influence over the WHO and CDC—both of which pushed vaccines relentlessly—suggests a darker motive. His Event 201 simulation in 2019, eerily predicting a coronavirus pandemic, adds fuel to the fire. If not depopulation, then what? Control? Profit? Either way, his role reeks of malice, not benevolence.

Fauci’s Medical Experimentation

Anthony Fauci, the face of the U.S. pandemic response, is no saint. As NIAID director, he championed the vaccines, downplaying risks while exaggerating COVID-19’s threat. His funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology—confirmed by NIH documents—raises questions: did he help create the crisis he later “solved”?

The vaccine rollout, with its untested mRNA technology, smacks of experimentation on an unwitting public. Fauci’s dismissive responses to VAERS data and his evasive congressional testimony—dodging questions from Senator Rand Paul—show a man more interested in power than truth.

Leaked Emails, Congressional Testimony, and Reclassified Deaths

Leaked emails from Fauci, obtained via FOIA, reveal a cozy relationship with Big Pharma and a willingness to suppress dissent. Congressional testimony from whistleblowers like Dr. David Martin alleges a coordinated effort to inflate COVID-19’s danger while pushing vaccines.

Then there’s the reclassification of deaths: flu and pneumonia fatalities suspiciously dropped in 2020-2021, while COVID-19 deaths soared. CDC data shows flu deaths plummeted from 38,000 in 2018-2019 to under 1,000 in 2020-2021—a statistical impossibility unless reclassified. This wasn’t a clerical error; it was a deliberate tactic to justify the vaccine agenda.

No Virus on Paper?

Here’s a bombshell: on paper, SARS-CoV-2’s existence is shaky. The CDC’s own 2020 document admits it lacked a quantifiable virus isolate for testing. Early PCR tests, amplified at high cycle thresholds, produced false positives, inflating case counts. If the virus was a phantom, the vaccine “solution” becomes a malicious experiment on a fabricated premise.

Medical Bureaucracies: Suppression and Inaction

The HHS, NIH, FDA, and CDC knew about side effects—myocarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, thrombosis—but suppressed them. The FDA’s Peter Marks ignored early VAERS signals, while NIH’s Francis Collins mocked skeptics. The CDC’s Walensky claimed vaccines were “safe and effective” despite mounting evidence to the contrary. Even with a new administration in 2021, these agencies offered breadcrumbs—minor advisories—while avoiding real accountability. Their inaction isn’t incompetence; it’s complicity in a malicious scheme.

A Malicious Masterplan

The 4.7x increase in deaths isn’t a fluke—it’s the result of intentional malice. VAERS data, though imperfect, screams a warning the government ignored. Big Pharma profited, shielded by an unconstitutional PREP Act, while Gates and Fauci pushed their agendas.

Leaked emails and reclassified deaths expose the lie, and medical bureaucracies buried the truth. Gottlieb, Azar, Slaoui, Woodcock, Marks, Collins, Walensky—they all share blame, their hands stained with the blood of the deceived. This wasn’t incompetence; it was a calculated assault on the American people, proving the cure was deadlier than the disease.